Showing posts with label Halloween. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Halloween. Show all posts

Monday, October 1, 2018

October Scare Fest 2018
Perspectives


October is here! Finally. You all know what that means. I take the fetid corpse of what was once The Impact Factor and levy it is a platform to share my enthusiasm for horror movies!

This year will be a bit different. Previously (the past 4 years of so) I've focused my horror movie watching exclusively around spooby-season. In 2018, I have cast away my fall shackles and decided the entire calendar year is a good time to watch some scary flicks. Therefore, my initial scored list is going to look quite massive. I wanted to put this disclaimer out there so all you fine folks didn't think I marathoned horror movies for 24 hours straight to get a head start on the season.

I will keep updating this list throughout the month, so be sure to check back often for more movies & scores!

As always, I would love your input & suggestions! I am always on the lookout for great titles. You can find the movies I watched the past four years here! 


October Scare Fest 2018
The Thing ('11): 1.5/5
The Cloverfield Paradox: 1.5/5
The Ritual: 4/5
Verónica: 3.5/5
Dismissed: 2/5
Cabin Fever ('16): 2/5
Dead Body: 2.5/5
Hell House LLC: 2.5/5
Evil Dead ('13): 3/5
Friend Request: 2.5/5
Desolation: 2/5
Tremors: A Cold Day in Hell: 1/5
Flatliners ('17): 1/5
Wish Upon: 1/5
Hereditary: 4.5/5
The First Purge: 4.5/5
A Quiet Place: 4/5
The Belko Experiment: 3.5/5
The Neighbor: 1.5/5
'Til Death Do Us Part: 1/5
Lakeview Terrace: 2.5/5
Emelie: 3/5
Deep Blue Sea 2: 1/5
The Meg: 3.5/5
The Nun: 2/5
Single White Female: 3.5/5
The Open House: 2/5
As Above So Below: 1.5/5
Child's Play 2: 2/5
Mandy: 5/5
The Woman in Black: 2/5
Tag (JP): 0/5
Murder Party: 4/5
Beyond the Gates: 2.5/5
Silent House: 2/5
Lights Out: 2/5
The Loved Ones: 3.5/5
Truth or Dare ('17): 2/5
Malevolent: 2/5
Apostle: 4/5

*Movies in brackets are ones I’ve seen previously. I've underlined films scored 4/5 or higher to emphasize the ones well-worth watching.

Friday, October 28, 2016

The Impact Factor Ep. 78: Game Dev Trick or Treat
Podcast
Welcome to the 78th episode of The Impact Factor! The Impact Factor is what happens when two scientists, and two best friends, get together to talk about video games. Hosts Alex Samocha [biomedical scientist] and Charles Fliss [social scientist] sit down every week to discuss the week in gaming! Listen in for the news, views, and games that made the biggest impact!

Please send your suggestions and feedback to: impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com

In this episode Alex and Fliss talk about about Bethesda ending early review copies, Battlefield 1, Evolve, Red Dead Redemption 2, Nintendo Switch, Kingdom Hearts I.5 & II.5, Final Fantasy XV, Halloween, the World Series, and our game dev tricks and treats!


YouTube page

Discord Server

For articles and reviews from Alex, check out: www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Follow Alex @alexsamocha on Twitter. twitch.tv/megalodonphd
Follow Fliss 
@thecfliss on Twitter.

Intro song:
You Kill My Brother by Go! Go! Go! Micro Invasion, East Jakarta Chiptunes Compilations. Freemusic Archive. (Attribution Noncommercial Share-Alike License)
Transitions:
News & Views and Perspectives transitions from victorcenusa, Freesound.org (Creative Commons 0 License)
Experimental Methods transition from Sentuniman, Freesound.org (Attribution Noncommercial License)

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Costume Time: Role Playing in Role-Playing Games
Perspectives


My silver hair danced gently across my face as I strode into a muddy, weather worn village by the river. An imposing castle sat atop this quiet town. But I wasn’t here for nobles. I wasn’t here for rest. I was here for one reason only—a bounty. For you see, a poster at a nearby tavern alerted me of a desperate need for a skilled warrior. A terrifying griffin had been ravaging a nearby town. I hopped on my horse and rode over. A quick stroll through the streets and it became obvious who my new employer would be. A woman sobbed outside her home, cursing fate and only wishing for her son’s safe return. The griffin had snatched him up while he was playing outside the town’s walls. He was gone in an instant. The mother pleaded with me to help her out. Her only son could be moments away from death. I listened to her request, and got the required information about the beast’s possible lair and habits. I then looked her squarely in her eyes, her brown against my fiery yellow. I asked coldly, “So what does this job pay?”

Sure, I (as Alex) felt bad for the traumatized mother. I (as Alex) hoped the young boy was still alive (though unlikely, griffins aren’t the most patient creatures). But I was not Alex. I was Geralt of Rivia. A bounty hunter. A Witcher. I didn’t ride across the land as a do gooder or as a righteous warrior. I had honed my craft at slaying monsters and ghosts and beasts alike for one reason: to get paid. Every single decision I made during conversation, exploration, and combat was that of the hardened bounty hunter Geralt. Sob stories were met with asking fees. My price was non-negotiable. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt allowed me to be this fantastic character. It allowed me to act in his stead. I always had choices and could have played The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt very differently, but I wanted to role-play. I wanted to wear my Geralt costume.

You got a problem, hey I'll solve it. For a fee, of course.
In this spooky, costume-wearing time of year I got to thinking why I like wearing these video game ‘costumes’ and the kinds of games in which these costumes exist. The first place many of us might think of, myself included, are role-playing games (RPGs). They often build a world around a character, or group of characters, that engage with a grand narrative. Sometimes it’s about stopping a madman in clown make-up from destroying the world, other times it’s about finding my long lost son in a post-nuclear wasteland. Who the characters are and how they interact with this grand narrative, however, can vary quite a bit between RPGs. In fact, you don’t always get to role-play a ‘character’ in a RPG. Let me explain.

Non-character ‘characters’ typically fall into two categories. The first you see quite often in Japanese RPGs. We’ll call it the overly controlled protagonist. A few examples out of the many I could have chosen are Cloud from Final Fantasy VII or Sora from Kingdom Hearts. There’s nothing wrong with having an overly controlled protagonist lead your RPG. They’re often endearing, sticking with you long after completing the game. But games like Final Fantasy VII and Kingdom Hearts don’t allow the player to make their own stamp on Cloud or Sora, respectively. Everything is pre-scripted. Gameplay inside and outside of combat doesn’t lend itself to adopting a persona. Cloud and Sora are great characters, but they cannot be costumes for me to put on.
And here you see the extent to which you can role-play as Sora.
The second type is the formless protagonist. Formless protagonists were traditionally found in western RPGs like The Elder Scrolls or Baldur’s Gate. You now also see them in Japanese RPGs like Bloodborne and Dragon’s Dogma. The main characters in these games lack any built-in personality. It starts from the character creation screen. In many of these games, you mold and shape a character to look exactly how you want her to. The same philosophy applies to playing the game. Everything about the character comes from you, the player. Good or bad, murderous or forgiving, these protagonists can be whatever you want them to be whenever you want them to be. I already see arguments popping up here. “But Alex, isn’t your character from Fallout 4 perfect for role-playing? It’s a perfect costume since you can be whatever you want!” But therein lies the problem. They aren’t characters. They’re me. They’re me when they are the Nice Guy™ doing good across the land, and they are also me when they are a sleazy scoundrel that drinks until he’s silly. I can’t frame my decisions within an authored context. I am the actions and the framework. The formless protagonist is great for role-playing, but an imperfect costume.

You can be Geralt in Fallout 4! Except not. You're always yourself as your own character.
So what makes Geralt of Rivia work as a costume? It is a combination of player agency in moment-to-moment decisions with predefined characteristics. Geralt has a backstory and personality. He has past decisions to atone for and a well-communicated set of core values. In cutscenes or other moments when control is removed from the player, Geralt acts according to the narrative framework of the developers. He is his own person. While playing, though, I get to define who I am as Geralt. A player like me could have just as easily been a Geralt that’s softened his stance on payments, due to the evolution of his relationship with his daughter figure Ciri. Another player’s Geralt could have gone the exact opposite direction—ignoring teary-eyed pleas for help because he has bigger fish to fry (namely the spectral Wild Hunt that wants him and Ciri dead). No Geralt is wrong, and all Geralts are a costume. I think of it like a mask you’d buy at a Halloween store. You’re not going to buy a block of rubber and cut & shape it into a mask. You’re going to buy one that’s already been made—one you can put your unique stamp on by the way in which you wear it.

Great costumes don’t happen that often in video games, so I relish every chance I get to put one on. A recent example is Adam Jensen in Deus Ex: Mankind Divided. Like Geralt, this augmented super spy has an authored identity that can be shaped by a player’s actions. Jensen’s tagline in Mankind Divided’s prequel was ‘I didn’t choose this.’ After nearly being blown to smithereens by gunfire, Jensen was rebuilt with top of the line mechanical prosthetics (augmentations) and asked to face off against those who would do harm. Coming into Mankind Divided, Jensen is perhaps more comfortable with his new identity but also, for me as Jensen, someone who never forgot his roots. I took his framework and built upon it.

I played an Adam Jensen that remembered what it was like to be powerless. A tough stint as a Detroit beat cop taught him humility. Taught him the value of all life, especially in an age when people are looking for any reason to treat others as subhuman. For those reasons, my Adam Jensen never killed. Anyone. Ever. I used non-lethal weapons like the stun gun or tranquilizer rifle, and made sure to knockout and enemy rather than break their neck. Even in trying moments, my Adam Jensen held true to his principles. In one instance, he faced off against a serial killer. This person had brutally murdered no less than four augmented individuals and had gotten away with it. In fact, she had lured Jensen into the sewers to be her next victim. Despite all that, Jensen didn’t want to kill her. Nor did he want her to end her own life. In a room rigged with explosives and deadly gas, Jensen carefully talked to the serial killer in an attempt to find out what he could say to peacefully put the murders to an end. And he did. I did. I wasn’t there to open fire or run her through with my arm’s nanoblade. Because that’s not the costume I was wearing.

Put the blade away Jensen. That's not you (or me as you).
I love these video game costumes. Maybe it’s my affinity for this unique kind of role-playing experience; maybe it’s just their scarcity. This Halloween enjoy the costumes you wear. Not just the ones you put on for a party. Enjoy the ones you wear while playing video games, too. From a mythical bounty hunter to an augmented super spy to anything in-between, costumes are a whole lot of fun. Now if only I could find a way to be given candy while wearing one.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

TIF’s Snuggle & Scream Ep. 05: The Invitation
Podcast
Snuggle and Scream as you listen to this podcast about horror films! In Season 2 of this special seasonal spin-off of The Impact Factor, Alex is joined by his co-host, fiancee and fellow (begrudging) horror movie watcher Justine to discuss some scary movies! Each episode we’ll talk about a new horror movie we’ve seen together and give our thoughts.

This week Justine and I discuss 2015's The Invitation.

Send questions & comments to: impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com
Alex is on Twitter @alexsamocha
Follow all things TIF: http://www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Intro: ‘Horror TV’ by FoolBoyMedia, freesound.org. Attribution Noncommercial License.

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

TIF’s Snuggle & Scream Ep. 04: Hush
Podcast
Snuggle and Scream as you listen to this podcast about horror films! In Season 2 of this special seasonal spin-off of The Impact Factor, Alex is joined by his co-host, fiancee and fellow (begrudging) horror movie watcher Justine to discuss some scary movies! Each episode we’ll talk about a new horror movie we’ve seen together and give our thoughts.

This week Justine and I discuss 2016's Hush.

Send questions & comments to: impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com
Alex is on Twitter @alexsamocha
Follow all things TIF: http://www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Intro: ‘Horror TV’ by FoolBoyMedia, freesound.org. Attribution Noncommercial License.

Friday, September 30, 2016

The Impact Factor Ep. 74: Tippecanoe and Destiny 2
Podcast
Welcome to the 74th episode of The Impact Factor! The Impact Factor is what happens when two scientists, and two best friends, get together to talk about video games. Hosts Alex Samocha [biomedical scientist] and Charles Fliss [social scientist] sit down every week to discuss the week in gaming! Listen in for the news, views, and games that made the biggest impact!

Please send your suggestions and feedback to: impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com

In this episode Alex and Fliss talk about Destiny 2, Hearthstone changes, Palmer Luckey & Oculus, Firewatch, PlayStation Experience, eSports, Battlerite, No Man’s Sky, skinnerware games, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, Scare Fest 2016, Snuggle & Scream and more!

“A Game Player’s Manifesto,” by Richard Garfield

The Impact Factor’s Scare Fest 2016

Snuggle & Scream podcast


YouTube page

For articles and reviews from Alex, check out: www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Follow Alex @alexsamocha on Twitter. twitch.tv/megalodonphd
Follow Fliss 
@thecfliss on Twitter.

Intro song:
You Kill My Brother by Go! Go! Go! Micro Invasion, East Jakarta Chiptunes Compilations. Freemusic Archive. (Attribution Noncommercial Share-Alike License)
Transitions:
News & Views and Perspectives transitions from victorcenusa, Freesound.org (Creative Commons 0 License)
Experimental Methods transition from Sentuniman, Freesound.org (Attribution Noncommercial License)

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

October Scare Fest 2016
Perspectives



I know it's only September, but Scare Fest is back! 2016 has been a year of very scary things (not the least of which is the Presidential election), so why not celebrate all the terror with a list of horror movies? This time it is bigger and better than ever. To accomodate and almost certainly overzealous list, I'm posting this a few days before the start of Halloween month.

As I do every October, I’m going to try to watch 3-4 horror movies each week. I predominantly put a focus on watching movies I've never seen. The titles below span all styles of horror, so you're sure to find one on the list that's up your alley. For archival's sake, I've included a scored list of the past two years. There is always more horror goodness to be found!

After watching each film I'll give it a numeric score and update this post. Let's hope I can find a couple more 5/5's!

Please follow along with me if you can! A ton of the films are on streaming services like Netflix and Amazon. If you do, let’s talk about them. Post comments here or hit me up on Twitter @alexsamocha. You can also shoot an email to impactfactorpodcast at gmail 


October Scare Fest 2016:
We Are Still Here: 3.5/5
We Are What We are: 1.5/5
Southbound: 2.5/5
The VVitch: 4/5
Under the Skin: 3/5
Offspring (09): 1/5
Hush: 4.5/5
The Box ('09): 1.5/5
Enter the Void: 2/5
They Look Like People: 3.5/5
The Invitation: 2.5/5
Baskin: 3/5
Irreversible: 2/5
Goodnight Mommy: 4/5
Goosebumps: 3.5/5
Green Room: 4.5/5
A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night: 3/5
Hatchet: 2.5/5
The Craft: 2.5/5
Ginger Snaps: 3/5
[Jennifer's Body]: 3.5/5

*Movies bolded and underlined have been seen & reviewed!

October Scare Fest 2014
Hellraiser: 3/5
Grabbers: 2/5
Candyman: 3/5
Honeymoon: 2.5/5
The Town That Dreaded Nightfall: 1/5
[Evil Dead 2]: 5/5
Rosemary’s Baby: 4/5
Re-Animator: 4.5/5
House of the Devil: 3.5/5
The Innkeepers: 3.5/5
The Taking of Deborah Logan: 3/5
The Sacrament: 2/5
Snowtown: 3.5/5
[Scream: 5/5]
[Trick r’ Treat: 5/5]

October Scare Fest 2015
The Visit: 3.5/5
[Orphan]: 2.5/5
The Babadook: 4/5
Creep ('14): 3/5
Wrymwood: Road of the Dead: 1/5
Unfriended: 2.5/5
Blue Ruin: 4/5
Housebound: 3.5/5
The Guest: 3.5/5
Martyrs: 4/5
The Hills Run Red: 2.5/5
The Nightmare (2015): 4/5
[Halloween]: 4.5/5
[Halloween 2]: 4/5
[Cabin in the Woods]: 5/5
[Trick r' Treat]: 5/5

*Movies in brackets are ones I’ve seen previously. I've underlined films scored 4/5 or higher to emphasize the ones well-worth watching.

Saturday, October 31, 2015

TIF’s Snuggle & Scream Ep. 03: Until Dawn
Podcast

Snuggle and Scream as you listen to this podcast about horror films! In this special seasonal spin-off of The Impact Factor, Alex is joined by his co-host, fiancee and fellow (begrudging) horror movie watcher Justine to discuss some scary movies! Each episode we’ll talk about a new horror movie we’ve seen together and give our thoughts.

This week Justine and I discuss 2015’s Until Dawn.

Send questions & comments to:impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com
Alex is on Twitter @alexsamocha
Follow all things TIF: http://www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Intro: ‘Horror TV’ by FoolBoyMedia, freesound.org. Attribution Noncommercial License.

Friday, October 30, 2015

News & Views
10/24/15-10/30/15

Happy (almost) Halloween everyone! It’s sad that we’re coming to the end of my favorite month of the year. But it’s exciting that the holiday is almost upon us! It’s not too late to join me in my Scare Fest 2015! I foresee candy and pizza and scary movies in my future. This time of year is great, too, because right after Halloween we go headlong into Thanksgiving and Christmas. Party time!

News & Views is back and awesome as always. This week I found great writing about why Halo’s story doesn’t matter, how Miyamoto wanted to create an entirely different GoldenEye, designing SOMA’s unforgettable monsters, and how the original Assassin’s Creed was so revolutionary.

In honor of Halloween, this week’s Spotlight is the 25 best horror movies since 2000. So now you have no excuse: get out there and watch some great stuff this spooky-scary weekend! Keep an eye on The Impact Factor on the 31st for something special!

And of course you can check out the brand new episode of The Impact Factor podcast that was posted today! You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, or if you prefer other methods, check out our SoundCloud. We’re on YouTube too!

Spotlight
Joshua Alston et. al, A.V. Club

Worth Reading
Latoya Peterson, Fusion.net

Kris Graft, Gamasutra

Daniel Hunter-Dowsing, Gamasutra

Michelle Ehrhardt, Kill Screen

Ben Kuchera, Polygon

With Comments
Ben Gabriel, Kill Scren
Gabriel writes a fascinating piece about how video games can be perfect vehicle for creepypasta. I love creepypastas. /r/nosleep is fantastic. This article really makes me want to borrow my fiancée’s 3DS to see Aika’s nightmare for myself. Spooky stuff fit for Halloween weekend!

Keith Stuart & Jordan Erica Webber, The Guardian
Miyamoto is such an interesting figure. His approach to game design is so thoroughly unique. I’d love to see his full vision of N64’s GoldenEye. A shooter with less violence, in which all of your downed foes greet you at the end of your playthrough sounds awesome. Stories like this are always fun to read, too. You’ve got to assume there’s some parallel dimension in which this version was released.

Mitch Dyer, IGN
Game ads are notoriously deceptive. They often lie about graphics (use pre-rendered cutscenes) and gameplay (show live actors). But I’ve never seen them lie about a game’s story, like what has happened with Halo 5. I’ve only played the first Halo and even I was captured by the concept behind the new game’s story. Master Chief is the bad guy?! And Spartan Locke is going to try to take him down?! So it came as a huge shock to me that this never happens in the game. I feel cheated, and I don’t even plan on buying Halo 5. It’s so bizarre.

Tyler Lee, Polygon
A boss battle best-of list with some nice visual flair. Like any superlative list, Lee misses out on a lot of great fights. The bosses he did choose, however, are all fantastic. It’s a nice graphic that brought a welcome bit of nostalgia. Man I need to play Shadow of the Colossus again.

Johnny Chiodini, Eurogamer
Chiodini puts together a video conversation that the industry has been collectively having for the past couple years. When should we review a game? Games are often broken at launch and improved in the week or two that follows. But what about online features? What about lasting impact? It’s a tough question and one that I suspect doesn’t have one good answer. Something to think about for all of us who share our thoughts on games.
The Impact Factor Ep. 26: Shameless Pug
Podcast


Welcome to the 26th episode of The Impact Factor! The Impact Factor is what happens when two scientists, and two best friends, get together to talk about video games. Hosts Alex Samocha [biomedical scientist] and Charles Fliss [social scientist] sit down every week to discuss the week in gaming! Listen in for the news, views, and games that made the biggest impact!
Please send your suggestions and feedback to: impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com

In this episode Alex and Fliss talk about Paris Games Week, No Man’s Sky, PS VR, Detroit: Become Human, SFV, SXSW, Persona 4 Dancing All Night, Until Dawn, Halloween & more!

The video game guide to sex--reader feature:metro.co.uk/2015/10/24/the-vide…rs-feature-5459168/


For articles and reviews from Alex, check out: www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com
For a blog about Japan, pop culture & more from Fliss, check out:
www.flissofthenorthstar.blogspot.com

YouTube page:www.youtube.com/channel/UC_zpRq6h1O7d2MlMYWhNNjw 

Follow Alex @alexsamocha on Twitter. 
twitch.tv/megalodonphd
Follow Fliss @
thecfliss on Twitter.
twitch.tv/flissofthenorthstar

Intro song:
You Kill My Brother by Go! Go! Go! Micro Invasion, East Jakarta Chiptunes Compilations. Freemusic Archive. (Attribution Noncommercial Share-Alike License)
freemusicarchive.org/music/Indonesi…s_Compilation/
Transitions:
News & Views and Perspectives transitions from victorcenusa, Freesound.org (Creative Commons 0 License)
freesound.org/people/victorcenusa/sounds/148785/
freesound.org/people/victorcenusa/sounds/148784/
Experimental Methods transition from Sentuniman, Freesound.org (Attribution Noncommercial License)
freesound.org/people/Setuniman/sounds/143994/

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

On Horror, Games, Death, and Immersion
Article

Abstract: Horror is a balancing act between immersion, momentum and tension. The movie genre is one of my favorites for its ability to create and draw me into a new worlds. Horror is not my favorite game genre, however. Player deaths can break immersion and halt forward momentum, which weakens them as horror experiences. My favorite horror games, Dead Space, Resident Evil 4 and SOMA however, are able to find this balance and each accomplishes this feat it it’s own unique way.

Horror speaks to me. I love the thrills, chills, kills. All of it. Slashers and monsters and psychological and supernatural. Every October I throw together a Scare Fest list, compiling a bunch of horror movies to watch and review. This year I even started doing a special seasonal podcast in which my fiancée and I discuss a recent scary movie we’ve seen together: Snuggle & Scream.



There are a lot of reasons I love horror, too many to write out in this article. One of the main reasons, and the inspiration for this article, is immersion. The genre as a whole is routinely effective at world building. The movies craft their characters, motivations, and the antagonist  clearly—and have them fit into a cohesive world. The source material mandates this. To be scared you need to be involved. A part of that world. Often this can be difficult when the ‘truth’ of your world involves werewolves and ghosts and preternaturally strong psychopaths. Horror movies often create worlds entirely dissimilar to our own. So they work to create a setting detailed enough that the viewer is transported there. Once you’re in the world, you can be scared.

John Carpenter's The Thing brought me into a new world. A terrifying one.
The immersion typically found in horror films is a strange one, though. There’s limitations. You’re in the world, you are the characters… right up until they die. As a viewer, you’re free from the deaths and murder. In the best horror films, you’re affected by it as if you were the character themselves but there’s that crucial separation that occurs at the character’s last few moments. The observer-participant hybridization is something that continues to fascinate me about horror, and one of the main reasons it’s my go-to movie genre.

Horror’s observer-participant dynamic allows for several things, the most important of which is momentum. Deaths do not remove you from the experience. Quite the contrary, deaths are a key facet of the experience. Despite rapid ends to character arcs, you’re (almost) always treated with one continuous experience. Culling, whether it be of characters or questions, is additive in horror—it narrows the focus and builds towards the film’s conclusion.

In Alien, you are the crew of the Nostromo. Until you're not. Because they're dead.
Despite my fanaticism for horror movies, that level of adoration hasn’t directly translated to a passion for horror video games. Don’t get me wrong, I do love horror games. I’ll talk about my three favorites here shortly. Several horror games have even been seminal in the understanding and implementation of modern game design. I would say, however, that as a whole horror games struggle to recapitulate the feeling you get while watching a scary movie. All too often, horror games fail at preserving momentum.

How do horror games, even some of the best, struggle to maintain a brisk momentum throughout? It all comes back to immersion. Like I wrote above, in horror movies you’re immersed right until the point of death. Your immersion breaks for a few moments, and then you’re right back in with the characters who’re still alive. But dying is a serious issue in games. The immersion in games does not end when a character dies. You are that protagonist whether you die or not. Death results (usually) in a game over screen and being sent back to your last checkpoint. This loop is problematic in three important ways. First, you lose momentum. The actions of your hero are halted dead in her tracks, only to be repeated once you make your way back to where you died. Second, it breaks immersion. Dying and coming back to life five minutes before you ate it isn’t something that happens in real life, nor is it a part of the game world that’s ever explained. To clarify that last point: when you die and respawn in Outlast it doesn’t fit within the reality of the game. There’s no explanation to it. There isn’t something like “In this insane asylum, those confined within its walls are doomed to live and die endlessly.” Or something to that effect. You respawn in a horror game because you have to, not because it fits the truth of the world. Functionally, the game just pretends you didn’t die. And finally, player deaths remove tension. Knowing what killed you and where it’s hiding (usually) strips fear from the encounter, and makes the final experience weaker overall.

Friday the 13th had a great / terrible game over screen. Seeing this too often
can kill the 'horror' of your time with any horror game.
Horror works when you have a perfect balance of the three: immersion, momentum, and tension. Horror games work when the balance of difficulty and death is titrated in such a way that you need to just barely survive. You are constantly in fear of dying, but death comes infrequently. Because you’re ostensibly one of the few characters that survives the ordeal, or at the very least makes it to the end of the ordeal (i.e. the end of the game), death is more set-back than an intended possibility. So few games get this balance right. In some, you die far too often and it kills momentum, tension, and immersion. In others, you never die and the game loses its scariness, transforming into either an action or exploration game depending on the underlying systems. Fortunately, there are a select few horror games that do an excellent job at maintaining this delicate balance. They also happen to be my three favorite horror games of all time. Let me tell you about how all three get the balance of difficulty, death and momentum correct, each in their own unique way.

2008’s Dead Space, by EA Redwood Shores (a.k.a. Visceral Games now) is first on the list. Let me make something clear from the start. Unless you’re incredibly, overly, pain-stakingly cautious, and good at third-person shooters, you will die during your time with Dead Space. It’s going to happen. Isaac Clarke, space-engineer turned space-alien slayer, can die in some pretty gruesome ways. Why deaths work in Dead Space as opposed to other titles, though, is how intimately they are a part of the game’s narrative and world. Ok, sure, Isaac Clarke isn’t supposed to die and the game offers no explanation on why you respawn. Death in Dead Space, however, is edifying. It builds immersion. The mysterious necromorphs are at the heart of your experience. Necromorphs are these emaciated, gory humanoid forces of dismemberment and death. Throughout most of the game, though, their particular brand of evil is a mystery. Why they are, what they are, and what their purpose is. While the game offers other types of narrative to answer these questions, one of the key ways in which you begin to understand your foe is death. They ways in which they decapitate you, disembowel you, build Dead Space’s world. There aren’t very many characters with which to interact in Dead Space. The necromorphs have no other way to communicate with the player other than tearing you limb from limb, so your early deaths act as a conversation. On top of all that, the ways in which they kill the player (rending extremities from torso, generally) reinforces the central gameplay mechanic of ‘strategic dismemberment.’ Shooting off necromorph limbs is the only way to kill them. Well, that plus a swift stomp to their noggin. Your death works synergistically with both world building and gameplay. In that way, Dead Space finds it’s own way to balance player deaths with its horror intentions.

Deaths are used as both conversation & world building. They're essential
to your experience with Dead Space.
Resident Evil 4 is next on the list. I love the Resident Evil franchise, but it wasn’t until the fourth entry into the main series that it really clicked for me. And I think a large part of why it felt so good to play, and felt so authentically horror, is because it nailed the balance of death and momentum. What I didn’t expect, however, is that the infusion of better action elements would be the reason behind this balance working so well. Leon Kennedy isn’t your standard powerless horror protagonist: he’s a government agent who has already proven his skill at killin’ zombies. With that knowledge, it makes sense he comes equipped with plenty of tools to handle his situation: guns, knifes, grenades, you name it. And you know how to use them. In addition, you have access to a fairly generous merchant who shows up everywhere to keep your personal armory stocked. All of this is necessary though, because Resident Evil 4 pits you against unfathomable odds. While playing the game you always feel like you’re on the cusp of dying. After each fight you’re left with precious little health and even less ammo. But you made it out alive. Resident Evil 4’s scenarios are perfectly designed to give the player this feeling over and over again. Case in point is one of the game’s earliest encounters in the town square. The player is tasked with fighting off a seemingly endless horde of angry villagers. The fight can last upwards of 15-20 minutes. Every time I’ve played the scenario I feel like I’m teetering on the precipice of death—my health is too low so I’m forced to sprint to a distant house to hide and heal, or my ammo is low so I try to bait the angry mob to come at me one at a time by strategically running way and re-engaging. Sure, you can die (and I did), but with skillful play and the right difficulty setting (normal or hard depending on player skill) Resident Evil 4 kills the player only a precious handful of times, and has them spread out often enough they don’t severely impact immersion or momentum.

You might be a badass, but Resident Evil 4 continually finds way
to put you on the precipice of death.
The most recent addition to this list is Frictional Game’s SOMA. The game does so much exceptionally well, and it’s easily one of the best games I've played this year. On top of having an incredible and mature sci-fi narrative that leaves the player with lingering existential dread, SOMA also has created a stunningly immersive world that is reinforced by a perfectly crafted balance of death and momentum. Perhaps most importantly, SOMA tries to scare the player very differently than most other horror games. SOMA isn’t about the fear of death and dying, like in Dead Space or Resident Evil, but rather the fear that arises when you ask questions like ‘what is death’ or ‘what does it mean to die.’ SOMA would be terrifying even if it were impossible for the player to die. But there are monsters, and you can die. Smartly, SOMA moves away from one-hit-kills like those in games like The Evil Within or Amnesia: The Dark Descent. It’s always two. This maintains momentum and severely limits replaying sections. Further, monsters appear frequently (or infrequently) enough that you’re constantly on edge that they might appear, but you’re never bogged down having to move past monster after monster. It maintains their scare factor. And finally, SOMA gives the player interesting ways to avoid dying. Some enemies, for example, can only see you if you are looking at them. This creates a new kind of tension. The player not only must move without looking at the monster, but it also places you physically closer an enemy than most other games. That quasi-safety in proximity creates a near-death feeling horror strives for. As a result, SOMA is a fantastic horror experience. Game or not.


SOMA moves away from scaring the player with death. It scares the player
by making them think about what death actually is.
The best of the best, whether movie or game, balance the many tensions that exist in horror. Horror games must be exceeding hard to design in this way, which makes the exceptions I described above all the more worth commending. So maybe give one of them a shot this Halloween weekend. Happy Scare Fest everyone.

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

TIF’s Snuggle & Scream Ep. 02: The Guest
Podcast


Snuggle and Scream as you listen to this podcast about horror films! In this special seasonal spin-off of The Impact Factor, Alex is joined by his co-host, fiancee and fellow (begrudging) horror movie watcher Justine to discuss some scary movies! Each episode we’ll talk about a new horror movie we’ve seen together and give our thoughts.

This week Justine and I discuss 2014’s The Guest.

Send questions & comments to:impactfactorpodcast@gmail.com
Alex is on Twitter @alexsamocha
Follow all things TIF: http://www.theimpactfactor.blogspot.com

Intro: ‘Horror TV’ by FoolBoyMedia, freesound.org. Attribution Noncommercial License.